![5d mark iii vs 6d for video 5d mark iii vs 6d for video](https://dslrvideoshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/5d-auto-focus.jpg)
This is not a camera aimed towards filmmakers of any serious nature. And adding insult to injury, there is no way to generate a clean HDMI feed to bypass the internal recording options. But the 6D Mark II lacks an All-I codec, leaving you with only the weaker IPB option. Both cameras put up the same 1080/60p maximum frame rate recording, and both wield a similar implementation of the lovely Dual-Pixel Autofocus.
5d mark iii vs 6d for video iso#
Again, we see stronger ISO performance and a full-frame sensor from the 6D Mark II, but the advantages end there. For filmmakers, the comparison is even worse.
![5d mark iii vs 6d for video 5d mark iii vs 6d for video](https://camerajabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Canon-6d-vs-5D-IV-1410x793.jpg)
Its folding screen, higher megapixel count, and marginally better ISO performance offset the slower burst speed and weaker Autofocus. The only major advantage that the 6D Mark II has over it is the sensor size. And as a bonus, you get the only flip-out screen of this trio! Comparing to the 7D Mark II though, we see that the competition is a fair bit tougher. So if losing features such as the ability to shoot to CF cards, 1/8000 shutter speed, and USB3.0 connectivity doesn’t bother you, the 6D Mark II could be the camera for you. It would be a rare photographer indeed who could look at a picture from each camera and discern any difference. Price-wise, it sits much closer to the 7D Mark II than the 5D Mark IV while still arguably capturing the same look. So why buy or rent this awkward middle child? Well, for Canon photographers that want that full-frame look, there really is no cheaper option. The 6D Mark II continues this grand tradition - it lacks dual card slots, and it just isn’t as friendly to filmmakers. They rock sensors similar to the 5Ds - but not with the same processors. They pack similar features to the 5D lineup - but missing a few of the tastier options. The 6D line has, for years now, served as Canon’s gateway to full-frame photo and video. At almost half the price of a 5D Mark IV, it is a sold choice for any videographer looking to buy on a budget and still hold their image to a high standard. It sports a clean 4:2:2 8-bit HDMI output and shoots slow-motion at 60fps in 1080 - both upgrades from the Mark I. This was Canon’s first implementation of Dual-Pixel autofocus in a DSLR body, and it hasn’t lost any of its luster. For filmmakers, it packs even more fun under the hood. Between the feature list and the durable build, this is a camera your renters will be happy with for years to come. Either the 5D-III or the 6D are going to offer better technical image quality than just about any other Canon camera that you might be using these days, and both have the wonderful full-frame goodness things going on.And on top of all that, it is also rated for 200,000 shutter cycles. I think the 5D-III is priced too high, as in $703 above the Nikon D800, and more or less $1500 above the 6D. I see the 6D as their "value proposition" full-frame, and their 5D III as their "pro generalist body". Neither have a built-in flash, so there's no built-in remote multi-flash commander without adding an awkward, expensive accessory from Canon, or expensive triggers that can do TTL multi-flash firing or control. The 100% viewfinder of the 5D III is a nice advantage over the 97% of the 6D, at least for those who want their pictures NOT to always show a little bit more once the files are downloaded. The number of focusing points is an advantage for the 5D-III, but it seems like 99% of all Canon shooters turn off all the peripheral AF points, thus reducing both high-tech AF systems to parity. Side by Side Comparison: Digital Photography ReviewĪs you can see, specification-wise the 5D Mark III and the 6D are close, or identical, on MANY features and specifications. I usually only back the 5D when I'm doing a video session or out trying to capture motion.Ĭheck out the dPreview side-by-side camera comparison tool. I honestly probably end up reaching for my 6D more often because I typically work in studio and the smaller size comes in handy as well as wifi screen viewing.
![5d mark iii vs 6d for video 5d mark iii vs 6d for video](https://cloudfront.slrlounge.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/5d2-vs-6d.jpg)
I have both cameras and they're both AWESOME. If you're considering video and or action/sports in the future then give it a strong consideration. If you're shooting studio/posed shots, and not interested in video I really don't see you gaining anything from making the leap to the 5D. Do you need 1/8000 shutter speed, 5 millioin auto focus points, headphone jack, negligibly higher flash sync speed or better handling of moire? In your situation it really seems like you don't. If you're seriously considering the Mark III but could use the extra funds to fund lighting and or lenses make sure what you're getting extra you're going to use. If you just want a great camera and get the bang for your buck get the 6D. If you want the best than obviously go with the Mark III.